FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4807 vs 1.4849

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4807 and 1.4849 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 240 MPa — strength does not separate them. 1.4849 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 9% for 1.4807. On the shop floor, 1.4849 welds better (good vs fair).

1.4849Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

1.4807 vs 1.4849: properties

1.48071.4849

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
170 GPa24.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

64 GPa9.3 Msi
66 GPa9.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

145 GPa21 Msi
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
490 MPa71.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
10%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

10 J7.4 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

185 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

90 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

195 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Reduction in Area 10%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,330°C2,426 °F
1,320°C2,408 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,390°C2,534 °F
1,385°C2,525 °F

Same in both: Density 7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

13 W/m·K7.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
13.5 W/m·K7.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F
15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 1,050°C1,922 °F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.7 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
20 / 100

Weldability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
5 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 15% · Castability 72 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.6 kg CO₂/kg
6.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

65%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Water 120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

20.9 MN·m/kg
21.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

175 kJ/m³
184 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.3 mm²/s
3.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

2
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.48491.4807

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.48071.4849
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4807 vs 1.4849 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 1.4807 and 1.4849?

Stainless Steel 1.4807 and 1.4849 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 240 MPa — strength does not separate them. 1.4849 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 9% for 1.4807.

Which is cheaper, 1.4807 or 1.4849?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 1.4807 or 1.4849?

1.4849. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (40/100) for 1.4807.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4807 and 1.4849 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.