FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4805 vs 1.4837

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4805 and 1.4837 are both stainless steel grades. 1.4837 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) for 1.4805, about 11% more. 1.4837 is harder — 190 HB against 165 HB for 1.4805 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 1.4837 conducts heat better (14.5 W/m·K vs 12.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 1.4837 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 1.4805 (high, $$$$).

1.4837Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

1.4805 vs 1.4837: properties

1.48051.4837

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

145 GPa21 Msi
150 GPa21.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

13%
12%

Reduction in Area

12%
15%

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
15 J11.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

165 HB
190 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
92 HRB

Compressive Strength

—
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
200 MPa29 ksi

Hardness, Vickers

—
200 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 185 GPa26.8 Msi · Shear Modulus 72 GPa10.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,300°C2,372 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

12.5 W/m·K7.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
14.5 W/m·K8.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,090°C1,994 °F
1,050°C1,922 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.8 % IACS
1.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

9.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m38.6 µΩ·in
9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
12 / 100

Castability

80 / 100
72 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
—

Same in both: Machinability 22 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 25% · Polishability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

68 MJ/kg29,235 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

140 L/kg16.8 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
68 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.7 MN·m/kg
24 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

183 kJ/m³
190 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.2 mm²/s
3.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

2
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.48371.4805

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.48051.4837
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4805 vs 1.4837 — frequently asked

Is 1.4837 stronger than 1.4805?

Yes. 1.4837 has a typical tensile strength of 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) against 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) for 1.4805 — about 11% more.

Which is cheaper, 1.4805 or 1.4837?

1.4837 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 1.4805 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 1.4805 or 1.4837?

1.4805. Its weldability rates fair (45/100) against fair (40/100) for 1.4837.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4805 and 1.4837 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.