FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4652-CD vs 1.4652 CW-1/4H

Stainless Steel · 1.4652 temper comparison

1.4652-CD and 1.4652 CW-1/4H are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, 1.4652: CD (cold drawn) versus CW-1/4H (cold worked strip, approx. 1/4 hard). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 1.4652 CW-1/4H is the stronger of the two: yield strength 750 MPa (109 ksi) against 700 MPa (102 ksi) for 1.4652-CD, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 950 MPa (138 ksi). In exchange, 1.4652-CD is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 20% for 1.4652 CW-1/4H, and 1.4652 CW-1/4H is harder (320 HB vs 300 HB). 1.4652-CD runs hotter in service (350°C vs 300°C continuous).

1.4652-CDChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

1.4652 CW-1/4HChoose it when strength drives the design.

1.4652-CD vs 1.4652 CW-1/4H: properties

1.4652-CD1.4652 CW-1/4H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

950 MPa138 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

700 MPa102 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
20%

Reduction in Area

45%
40%

Compressive Strength

720 MPa104 ksi
770 MPa112 ksi

Shear Strength

570 MPa82.7 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

160 MPa·√m146 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

110 J81.1 ft·lbf
100 J73.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

300 HB
320 HB

Hardness, Vickers

315 HV
330 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 195 GPa28.3 Msi · Shear Modulus 75 GPa10.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 163 GPa23.6 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Hardness, Rockwell B 95 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,320°C2,408 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 8.5 W/m·K4.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 510 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

7.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.1 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.2 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.05 V · Corrosion Resistance 91 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

22%
13%

Weldability

60 / 100
58 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 50 / 100 · Polishability 78 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.8 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 45%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.4652

1.4652-CD vs 1.4652 CW-1/4H — frequently asked

Is 1.4652 CW-1/4H stronger than 1.4652-CD?

Yes. 1.4652 CW-1/4H has a typical yield strength of 750 MPa (109 ksi) against 700 MPa (102 ksi) for 1.4652-CD — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 950 MPa (138 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, CD or CW-1/4H?

Annealed is the default 1.4652 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither CD nor CW-1/4H). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4652-CD or 1.4652 CW-1/4H?

1.4652-CD. Its machinability rates poor (20/100) against not recommended (12/100) for 1.4652 CW-1/4H.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4652-CD and 1.4652 CW-1/4H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.