FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4630 vs 430

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4630 and 430 are both stainless steel grades. 430 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for 1.4630, about 9% more. 1.4630 is stiffer (220 GPa vs 200 GPa) and 430 conducts electricity better (2.9 % IACS vs 2.6 % IACS). On the shop floor, 1.4630 welds better (very good vs good).

1.4630Choose it when it will be welded.

430Choose it when strength drives the design.

1.4630 vs 430: properties

1.4630430

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

220 GPa31.9 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

85 GPa12.3 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
30%

Reduction in Area

60%
65%

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

165 HV
160 HV

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.28 · Hardness, Brinell 155 HB · Hardness, Rockwell B 82 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Same in both: Density 7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,510°C2,750 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
26 W/m·K15 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.5 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F
10.4 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

850°C1,562 °F
815°C1,499 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.6 % IACS
2.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
54%

Weldability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
80 L/kg9.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
65 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

28.6 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

205 kJ/m³
240 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.8 mm²/s
7.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale4301.4630

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4630430
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4630 vs 430 — frequently asked

Is 430 stronger than 1.4630?

Yes. 430 has a typical tensile strength of 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for 1.4630 — about 9% more.

Which is cheaper, 1.4630 or 430?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4630 or 430?

1.4630. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (50/100) for 430; for welding the order is 1.4630 first (very good, 80/100) then 430 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4630 and 430 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.