FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4319 vs 301

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4319 and 301 are both stainless steel grades. 301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) for 1.4319, about 97% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, 1.4319 is the more ductile: elongation 55% versus 25% for 301, and 301 is harder (270 HB vs 170 HB). 1.4319 runs hotter in service (800°C vs 425°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1.4319 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 301 (premium, $$$).

1.4319Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

301Choose it when strength drives the design.

1.4319 vs 301: properties

1.4319301

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

195 GPa28.3 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

55%
25%

Reduction in Area

68%
45%

Compressive Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Shear Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

150 J111 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

170 HB
270 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
100 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

180 HV
285 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
27 HRC

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 152 GPa22 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,395°C2,543 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15.5 W/m·K9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F
16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

280 J/g120 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

800°C1,472 °F
425°C797 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

7.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.7 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.4 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
40%

Weldability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

88 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
5.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
150 L/kg18 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
114 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.7 MN·m/kg
24.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

216 kJ/m³
842 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.9 mm²/s
4.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale3011.4319

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4319301
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Cold Rolled
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black Oxide—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4319 vs 301 — frequently asked

Is 301 stronger than 1.4319?

Yes. 301 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) for 1.4319 — about 97% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4319 or 301?

1.4319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 301 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4319 or 301?

1.4319, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 40/100 against 35/100 for 301; for welding the order is 1.4319 first (very good, 70/100) then 301 (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4319 and 301 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.