FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4035 +C vs 1.4035 +QT650

Stainless Steel · 1.4035 temper comparison

1.4035 +C and 1.4035 +QT650 are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, 1.4035: +C (cold drawn) versus +QT650 (quenched and tempered, Rm 650–850 MPa). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 1.4035 +C is the stronger of the two: yield strength 650 MPa (94.3 ksi) against 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) for 1.4035 +QT650, about 30% more; tensile strength follows at 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 750 MPa (109 ksi). In exchange, 1.4035 +QT650 is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 8% for 1.4035 +C, and 1.4035 +C is harder (260 HB vs 225 HB). 1.4035 +QT650 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1.4035 +C machines more easily (very good vs good).

1.4035 +CChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

1.4035 +QT650Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

1.4035 +C vs 1.4035 +QT650: properties

1.4035 +C1.4035 +QT650

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

850 MPa123 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

650 MPa94.3 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
14%

Reduction in Area

25%
35%

Compressive Strength

670 MPa97.2 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Shear Strength

510 MPa74 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
58 MPa·√m52.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

10 J7.4 ft·lbf
14 J10.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

260 HB
225 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

102 HRB
98 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

272 HV
236 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 215 GPa31.2 Msi · Shear Modulus 82 GPa11.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.28

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 10.5 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 260 J/g112 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.35 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
62 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

72%
62%

Weldability

8 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

12 / 100
14 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 52 MJ/kg22,356 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.3 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 55%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.4035

1.4035 +C vs 1.4035 +QT650 — frequently asked

Is 1.4035 +C stronger than 1.4035 +QT650?

Yes. 1.4035 +C has a typical yield strength of 650 MPa (94.3 ksi) against 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) for 1.4035 +QT650 — about 30% more. Tensile strength is 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 750 MPa (109 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, +C or +QT650?

+A is the default 1.4035 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither +C nor +QT650). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4035 +C or 1.4035 +QT650?

1.4035 +C. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (62/100) for 1.4035 +QT650.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4035 +C and 1.4035 +QT650 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.