FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4029 +C vs 1.4029 +QT850

Stainless Steel · 1.4029 temper comparison

1.4029 +C and 1.4029 +QT850 are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, 1.4029: +C (cold drawn) versus +QT850 (quenched and tempered, Rm 850–1000 MPa). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 1.4029 +QT850 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 700 MPa (102 ksi) against 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) for 1.4029 +C, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 920 MPa (133 ksi) vs 830 MPa (120 ksi). 1.4029 +QT850 is harder — 275 HB against 250 HB for 1.4029 +C — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 1.4029 +QT850 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, 1.4029 +C machines more easily (good vs fair).

1.4029 +CChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

1.4029 +QT850Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

1.4029 +C vs 1.4029 +QT850: properties

1.4029 +C1.4029 +QT850

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

830 MPa120 ksi
920 MPa133 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Reduction in Area

30%
28%

Compressive Strength

640 MPa92.8 ksi
720 MPa104 ksi

Shear Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
410 MPa59.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

14 J10.3 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

250 HB
275 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

101 HRB
96 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

262 HV
290 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 215 GPa31.2 Msi · Shear Modulus 82 GPa11.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 10%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 10.5 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 260 J/g112 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3 % IACS
3.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in
5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

24 / 100
28 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.3 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
48 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

72%
45%

Weldability

10 / 100
12 / 100

Formability (cold)

12 / 100
5 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100 · Polishability 35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.4 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 60%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.4029

1.4029 +C vs 1.4029 +QT850 — frequently asked

Is 1.4029 +QT850 stronger than 1.4029 +C?

Yes. 1.4029 +QT850 has a typical yield strength of 700 MPa (102 ksi) against 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) for 1.4029 +C — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 920 MPa (133 ksi) vs 830 MPa (120 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, +C or +QT850?

+A is the default 1.4029 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither +C nor +QT850). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4029 +C or 1.4029 +QT850?

1.4029 +C. Its machinability rates good (68/100) against fair (48/100) for 1.4029 +QT850.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4029 +C and 1.4029 +QT850 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.