FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn95Sb5 vs Sn97Cu3

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn95Sb5 and Sn97Cu3 are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Sn95Sb5 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for Sn97Cu3, about 20% more; tensile strength follows at 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 35 MPa (5.08 ksi). Sn97Cu3 is harder — 15 HB against 13 HB for Sn95Sb5 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Sn95Sb5 is stiffer (48 GPa vs 45 GPa) and Sn95Sb5 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 125°C continuous).

Sn95Sb5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Sn97Cu3Choose it when surface hardness matters.

Sn95Sb5 vs Sn97Cu3: properties

Sn95Sb5Sn97Cu3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

48 GPa7 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

18 GPa2.6 Msi
17 GPa2.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

38%
35%

Shear Strength

38 MPa5.5 ksi
27 MPa3.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

18 MPa2.6 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

13 HB
15 HB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 55 GPa8 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.25 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³
7.33 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

235°C455 °F
227°C441 °F

Liquidus Temperature

240°C464 °F
310°C590 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

28 W/m·K16.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
65 W/m·K37.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

220 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F
230 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

27 µm/m·K15 µin/in·°F
23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
125°C257 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-55°C-67 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 60 J/g25.8 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11.5 % IACS
13.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in
1.28×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.04 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.5 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Formability (cold)

88 / 100
90 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Weldability 20 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb
300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 18 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

6 kN·m/kg
5 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

6.6 MN·m/kg
6.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

9 kJ/m³
7 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

17.6 mm²/s
38.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
2

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSn95Sb5Sn97Cu3

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySn95Sb5Sn97Cu3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Sn95Sb5 vs Sn97Cu3 — frequently asked

Is Sn95Sb5 stronger than Sn97Cu3?

Yes. Sn95Sb5 has a typical yield strength of 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for Sn97Cu3 — about 20% more. Tensile strength is 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 35 MPa (5.08 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Sn95Sb5 or Sn97Cu3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose Sn95Sb5 over Sn97Cu3?

Pick Sn95Sb5 when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat. Pick Sn97Cu3 when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Sn95Sb5 and Sn97Cu3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.