FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn63Pb37Sb vs Sn92Cu6Ag2

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn63Pb37Sb and Sn92Cu6Ag2 are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Both yield at about 38 MPa — strength does not separate them. Sn63Pb37Sb is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 22% for Sn92Cu6Ag2, and Sn92Cu6Ag2 is harder (18 HB vs 16 HB). Sn92Cu6Ag2 is lighter (7.35 g/cm³ vs 8.4 g/cm³ for Sn63Pb37Sb) and Sn92Cu6Ag2 is stiffer (50 GPa vs 32 GPa).

Sn63Pb37SbChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Sn92Cu6Ag2Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

Sn63Pb37Sb vs Sn92Cu6Ag2: properties

Sn63Pb37SbSn92Cu6Ag2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

32 GPa4.6 Msi
50 GPa7.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

12.5 GPa1.8 Msi
18.5 GPa2.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

50 GPa7.3 Msi
58 GPa8.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.36

Elongation at Break

32%
22%

Shear Strength

38 MPa5.5 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

15 MPa2.2 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

16 HB
18 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
19 HV

Same in both: Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 58 MPa8.4 ksi · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 38 MPa5.5 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.4 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
7.35 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

183°C361 °F
217°C423 °F

Liquidus Temperature

185°C365 °F
380°C716 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
62 W/m·K35.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

170 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F
232 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

24.5 µm/m·K13.6 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

42 J/g18.1 BTU/lb
62 J/g26.7 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-55°C-67 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11.5 % IACS
12 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in
1.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.51 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.5 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
—

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

100 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb
330 MJ/kg141,875 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11 kg CO₂/kg
20 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

7 kN·m/kg
8 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3.8 MN·m/kg
6.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

23 kJ/m³
14 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

35 mm²/s
36.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSn63Pb37SbSn92Cu6Ag2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySn63Pb37SbSn92Cu6Ag2
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Sn63Pb37Sb vs Sn92Cu6Ag2 — frequently asked

What is the difference between Sn63Pb37Sb and Sn92Cu6Ag2?

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn63Pb37Sb and Sn92Cu6Ag2 are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Both yield at about 38 MPa — strength does not separate them. Sn63Pb37Sb is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 22% for Sn92Cu6Ag2, and Sn92Cu6Ag2 is harder (18 HB vs 16 HB).

Which is cheaper, Sn63Pb37Sb or Sn92Cu6Ag2?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Sn63Pb37Sb or Sn92Cu6Ag2?

Sn92Cu6Ag2, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 20/100 for Sn63Pb37Sb.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Sn63Pb37Sb and Sn92Cu6Ag2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.