FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy SAC387 vs Sn63Pb37Sb

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy SAC387 and Sn63Pb37Sb are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Sn63Pb37Sb is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for SAC387, about 16% more. Sn63Pb37Sb is harder — 16 HB against 15 HB for SAC387 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. SAC387 is lighter (7.44 g/cm³ vs 8.4 g/cm³ for Sn63Pb37Sb) and SAC387 is stiffer (50 GPa vs 32 GPa). On the shop floor, SAC387 welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100).

SAC387Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

Sn63Pb37SbChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

SAC387 vs Sn63Pb37Sb: properties

SAC387Sn63Pb37Sb

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

50 GPa7.3 Msi
32 GPa4.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

18.5 GPa2.7 Msi
12.5 GPa1.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

59 GPa8.6 Msi
50 GPa7.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

33%
32%

Shear Strength

32 MPa4.6 ksi
38 MPa5.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

20 MPa2.9 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

15 HB
16 HB

Hardness, Vickers

15 HV
—

Same in both: Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 38 MPa5.5 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.44 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
8.4 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

217°C423 °F
183°C361 °F

Liquidus Temperature

219°C426 °F
185°C365 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

58 W/m·K33.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

230 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F
170 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F
24.5 µm/m·K13.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

62 J/g26.7 BTU/lb
42 J/g18.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

125°C257 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -55°C-67 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

13 % IACS
11.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.32×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.2 µΩ·in
1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.5 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

98 / 100
100 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 20 / 100 · Formability (cold) 90 / 100 · Polishability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

350 MJ/kg150,473 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

24 kg CO₂/kg
11 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

700 L/kg83.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

6.7 MN·m/kg
3.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

14 kJ/m³
23 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

33.9 mm²/s
35 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
4

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 7 kN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSn63Pb37SbSAC387

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySAC387Sn63Pb37Sb
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

SAC387 vs Sn63Pb37Sb — frequently asked

Is Sn63Pb37Sb stronger than SAC387?

Yes. Sn63Pb37Sb has a typical tensile strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for SAC387 — about 16% more.

Which is cheaper, SAC387 or Sn63Pb37Sb?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, SAC387 or Sn63Pb37Sb?

SAC387. Its weldability rates poor (30/100) against poor (20/100) for Sn63Pb37Sb.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in SAC387 and Sn63Pb37Sb side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.