FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn50Pb50 vs Sn60Pb40E

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Sn50Pb50 and Sn60Pb40E are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Sn60Pb40E is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for Sn50Pb50, about 19% more. In exchange, Sn50Pb50 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 35% for Sn60Pb40E, and Sn60Pb40E is harder (16 HB vs 14 HB). Sn60Pb40E is lighter (8.5 g/cm³ vs 8.87 g/cm³ for Sn50Pb50) and Sn60Pb40E is stiffer (30 GPa vs 27 GPa).

Sn50Pb50Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Sn60Pb40EChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Sn50Pb50 vs Sn60Pb40E: properties

Sn50Pb50Sn60Pb40E

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

9.6 GPa1.4 Msi
11 GPa1.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
48 GPa7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
35%

Compressive Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
—

Shear Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
34 MPa4.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

14 MPa2 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

14 HB
16 HB

Hardness, Vickers

13 HV
14 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 30 MPa4.4 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.87 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.5 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

216°C421 °F
190°C374 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 183°C361 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

47 W/m·K27.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

176 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F
180 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F
24.5 µm/m·K13.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

43 J/g18.5 BTU/lb
42 J/g18.1 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-55°C-67 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 100°C212 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10.9 % IACS
11.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.58×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.22 µΩ·in
1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.52 V
-0.5 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

97 / 100
100 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 20 / 100 · Formability (cold) 90 / 100 · Castability 92 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

170 MJ/kg73,087 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

9.5 kg CO₂/kg
10.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

5 kN·m/kg
6 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3 MN·m/kg
3.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

17 kJ/m³
15 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

30.1 mm²/s
32.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSn60Pb40ESn50Pb50

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySn50Pb50Sn60Pb40E
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Sn50Pb50 vs Sn60Pb40E — frequently asked

Is Sn60Pb40E stronger than Sn50Pb50?

Yes. Sn60Pb40E has a typical tensile strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for Sn50Pb50 — about 19% more.

Which is cheaper, Sn50Pb50 or Sn60Pb40E?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Sn50Pb50 or Sn60Pb40E?

Sn60Pb40E, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for Sn50Pb50.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Sn50Pb50 and Sn60Pb40E side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.