FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy In100 vs In52Sn48

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy In100 and In52Sn48 are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. In52Sn48 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 7 MPa (1.02 ksi) against 0.8 MPa (0.116 ksi) for In100, about 8.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 12 MPa (1.73 ksi) vs 3 MPa (0.377 ksi). In52Sn48 is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 40% for In100, and In52Sn48 is harder (5 HB vs 1 HB). In52Sn48 is stiffer (20 GPa vs 11 GPa) and In100 runs hotter in service (80°C vs 60°C continuous). On the shop floor, In100 welds better (very good vs not recommended).

In100Choose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.

In52Sn48Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

In100 vs In52Sn48: properties

In100In52Sn48

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
20 GPa2.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

3.7 GPa0.54 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

41 GPa5.9 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

3 MPa0.38 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

0.8 MPa0.12 ksi
7 MPa1 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
60%

Shear Strength

3 MPa0.44 ksi
11 MPa1.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

1 HB
5 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.31 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³
7.3 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

157°C314 °F
118°C244 °F

Liquidus Temperature

157°C314 °F
118°C244 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

81.8 W/m·K47.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
34 W/m·K19.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

233 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
200 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

32.1 µm/m·K17.8 µin/in·°F
20 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

29 J/g12.3 BTU/lb
28 J/g12 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

20.6 % IACS
11.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8.37×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.3 µΩ·in
1.47×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.79 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.55 V · Corrosion Resistance 45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
20 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

98 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

10 / 100
—

Same in both: Castability 90 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 98 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,720 MJ/kg739,468 BTU/lb
1,600 MJ/kg687,877 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

102 kg CO₂/kg
105 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

2,500 L/kg300 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

0 kN·m/kg
2 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.5 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

0 kJ/m³
1 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48 mm²/s
23.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 1

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleIn52Sn48In100

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityIn100In52Sn48
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

In100 vs In52Sn48 — frequently asked

Is In52Sn48 stronger than In100?

Yes. In52Sn48 has a typical yield strength of 7 MPa (1.02 ksi) against 0.8 MPa (0.116 ksi) for In100 — about 8.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 12 MPa (1.73 ksi) vs 3 MPa (0.377 ksi).

Which is cheaper, In100 or In52Sn48?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, In100 or In52Sn48?

In52Sn48, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 20/100 against 15/100 for In100; for welding the order is In100 first (very good, 80/100) then In52Sn48 (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in In100 and In52Sn48 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.