Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 vs In52Sn48
Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison
Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 and In52Sn48 are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) against 7 MPa (1.02 ksi) for In52Sn48, about 4.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.73 ksi). In exchange, In52Sn48 is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 2% for Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5, and Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 is harder (13 HB vs 5 HB). In52Sn48 is lighter (7.3 g/cm³ vs 9.4 g/cm³ for Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5) and Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 is stiffer (26 GPa vs 20 GPa). On the shop floor, Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 machines more easily (fair vs poor).
Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.
In52Sn48Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.
Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 vs In52Sn48: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all solder & low-melting alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all solder & low-melting alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5In52Sn48
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Vickers
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 1
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 | In52Sn48 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 vs In52Sn48 — frequently asked
Is Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 stronger than In52Sn48?
Yes. Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 has a typical yield strength of 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) against 7 MPa (1.02 ksi) for In52Sn48 — about 4.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 12 MPa (1.73 ksi).
Which is cheaper, Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 or In52Sn48?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 or In52Sn48?
Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (20/100) for In52Sn48; for welding the order is In52Sn48 first (not recommended, 10/100) then Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 (not recommended, 5/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Bi42.5Pb37.7Sn11.3Cd8.5 and In52Sn48 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.