FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Bi58Sn42 vs Rose's Metal

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Bi58Sn42 and Rose's Metal are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Bi58Sn42 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for Rose's Metal, about 133% more; tensile strength follows at 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi). Bi58Sn42 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 25% for Rose's Metal, and Bi58Sn42 is harder (22 HB vs 11 HB). Bi58Sn42 is lighter (8.56 g/cm³ vs 9.7 g/cm³ for Rose's Metal) and Bi58Sn42 is stiffer (42 GPa vs 25 GPa).

Bi58Sn42Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Bi58Sn42 vs Rose's Metal: properties

Bi58Sn42Rose's Metal

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
25 GPa3.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

16 GPa2.3 Msi
9.5 GPa1.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

41 GPa5.9 Msi
33 GPa4.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

65 MPa9.4 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
25%

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

20 MPa2.9 ksi
—

Hardness, Brinell

22 HB
11 HB

Hardness, Vickers

23 HV
—

Compressive Strength

—
55 MPa8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.56 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
9.7 g/cm³0.35 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

138°C280 °F
98°C208 °F

Liquidus Temperature

138°C280 °F
110°C230 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

19 W/m·K11 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
20 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

45 J/g19.3 BTU/lb
36 J/g15.5 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
45°C113 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 167 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5 % IACS
2.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m13.4 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.45 V
-0.5 V

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

20 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
90 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
35%

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Polishability 30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb
120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11 kg CO₂/kg
8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

8 kN·m/kg
3 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

4.9 MN·m/kg
2.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

21 kJ/m³
6 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
9.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

2
1

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleBi58Sn42Rose's Metal

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBi58Sn42Rose's Metal
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Bi58Sn42 vs Rose's Metal — frequently asked

Is Bi58Sn42 stronger than Rose's Metal?

Yes. Bi58Sn42 has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for Rose's Metal — about 133% more. Tensile strength is 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Bi58Sn42 or Rose's Metal?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, Bi58Sn42 or Rose's Metal?

Bi58Sn42. Its weldability rates poor (20/100) against poor (15/100) for Rose's Metal.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Bi58Sn42 and Rose's Metal side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.