FabDigitFabDigit

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Antimonial Lead 6% Sb vs Chemical Lead

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy · grade comparison

Solder & Low-Melting Alloy Antimonial Lead 6% Sb and Chemical Lead are both solder & low-melting alloy grades. Antimonial Lead 6% Sb is the stronger of the two: yield strength 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for Chemical Lead, about 5.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 17 MPa (2.47 ksi). In exchange, Chemical Lead is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 25% for Antimonial Lead 6% Sb, and Antimonial Lead 6% Sb is harder (14 HB vs 5 HB). Antimonial Lead 6% Sb is lighter (10.88 g/cm³ vs 11.34 g/cm³ for Chemical Lead) and Antimonial Lead 6% Sb is stiffer (17 GPa vs 14 GPa). On the shop floor, Antimonial Lead 6% Sb machines more easily (very good vs good).

Antimonial Lead 6% SbChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Chemical LeadChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Antimonial Lead 6% Sb vs Chemical Lead: properties

Antimonial Lead 6% SbChemical Lead

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

17 GPa2.5 Msi
14 GPa2 Msi

Shear Modulus

6.2 GPa0.9 Msi
5.6 GPa0.81 Msi

Bulk Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
46 GPa6.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.44

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
17 MPa2.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
6 MPa0.87 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
50%

Compressive Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
—

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
13 MPa1.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

14 MPa2 ksi
3 MPa0.44 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

14 HB
5 HB

Hardness, Vickers

15 HV
5 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.88 g/cm³0.39 lb/in³
11.34 g/cm³0.41 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

252°C486 °F
327°C621 °F

Liquidus Temperature

296°C565 °F
328°C622 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
34.5 W/m·K19.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

132 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F
129 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

27 µm/m·K15 µin/in·°F
29 µm/m·K16.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

26 J/g11.2 BTU/lb
23 J/g10 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 100°C212 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5.9 % IACS
7.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.4 µΩ·in
2.13×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.39 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.55 V
-0.52 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

200%
—

Weldability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Castability 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

27 MJ/kg11,608 BTU/lb
25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

5 kN·m/kg
1 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.6 MN·m/kg
1.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

26 kJ/m³
1 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

17.4 mm²/s
23.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
1

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every solder & low-melting alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

125102050891011Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleChemical LeadAntimonial Lead 6% Sb

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAntimonial Lead 6% SbChemical Lead
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Antimonial Lead 6% Sb vs Chemical Lead — frequently asked

Is Antimonial Lead 6% Sb stronger than Chemical Lead?

Yes. Antimonial Lead 6% Sb has a typical yield strength of 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) against 6 MPa (0.87 ksi) for Chemical Lead — about 5.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 17 MPa (2.47 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Antimonial Lead 6% Sb or Chemical Lead?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Antimonial Lead 6% Sb or Chemical Lead?

Antimonial Lead 6% Sb. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against good (55/100) for Chemical Lead; for welding the order is Chemical Lead first (very good, 75/100) then Antimonial Lead 6% Sb (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Antimonial Lead 6% Sb and Chemical Lead side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.