FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Zr 702C vs Zr 705

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Zr 702C and Zr 705 are both refractory metal grades. Zr 705 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for Zr 702C, about 80% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi). Zr 705 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 16% for Zr 702C, and Zr 705 is harder (200 HB vs 150 HB). Zr 702C conducts heat better (22 W/m·K vs 17.1 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Zr 702C welds better (very good vs good).

Zr 702CChoose it when it will be welded.

Zr 705Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Zr 702C vs Zr 705: properties

Zr 702CZr 705

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

99 GPa14.4 Msi
97 GPa14.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
97 GPa14.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
20%

Reduction in Area

25%
40%

Shear Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

160 MPa23.2 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
27 J19.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
95 HRB

Compressive Strength

—
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Hardness, Vickers

—
210 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 36 GPa5.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

6.51 g/cm³0.24 lb/in³
6.64 g/cm³0.24 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,852°C3,366 °F
1,840°C3,344 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,855°C3,371 °F
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

22 W/m·K12.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
17.1 W/m·K9.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

285 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F
281 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5.9 µm/m·K3.3 µin/in·°F
6.3 µm/m·K3.5 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 155 J/g66.6 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

4.3 % IACS
3.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m15.7 µΩ·in
5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.1 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

32%
22%

Weldability

75 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,250 MJ/kg537,404 BTU/lb
1,400 MJ/kg601,892 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

80 kg CO₂/kg
85 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

69 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.2 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

316 kJ/m³
1,044 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
9.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleZr 702CZr 705

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityZr 702CZr 705
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Zr 702C vs Zr 705 — frequently asked

Is Zr 705 stronger than Zr 702C?

Yes. Zr 705 has a typical yield strength of 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for Zr 702C — about 80% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Zr 702C or Zr 705?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, Zr 702C or Zr 705?

Zr 702C. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against good (65/100) for Zr 705.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Zr 702C and Zr 705 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.