Refractory Metal Zr-2.5Nb vs Zr 702C
Refractory Metal · grade comparison
Refractory Metal Zr-2.5Nb and Zr 702C are both refractory metal grades. Zr-2.5Nb is the stronger of the two: yield strength 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for Zr 702C, about 72% more; tensile strength follows at 610 MPa (88.5 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi). Zr-2.5Nb is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 16% for Zr 702C, and Zr-2.5Nb is harder (185 HB vs 150 HB). Zr 702C conducts heat better (22 W/m·K vs 17.1 W/m·K).
Zr-2.5NbChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
Zr-2.5Nb vs Zr 702C: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all refractory metal grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all refractory metal grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Shear Modulus 36 GPa5.2 Msi
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 285 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 155 J/g66.6 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Polishability
Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 80 kg CO₂/kg
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 17
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | Zr-2.5Nb | Zr 702C |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Zr-2.5Nb vs Zr 702C — frequently asked
Is Zr-2.5Nb stronger than Zr 702C?
Yes. Zr-2.5Nb has a typical yield strength of 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for Zr 702C — about 72% more. Tensile strength is 610 MPa (88.5 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).
Which is cheaper, Zr-2.5Nb or Zr 702C?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which welds better, Zr-2.5Nb or Zr 702C?
Zr 702C. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against very good (70/100) for Zr-2.5Nb.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Zr-2.5Nb and Zr 702C side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.