FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Mo-La vs Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1)

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Mo-La and Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1) are both refractory metal grades. Mo-La is the stronger of the two: yield strength 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1), about 133% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 445 MPa (64.5 ksi). In exchange, Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1) is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 8% for Mo-La, and Mo-La is harder (228 HB vs 160 HB). Mo-La is lighter (10.2 g/cm³ vs 13.31 g/cm³ for Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1)) and Mo-La is stiffer (320 GPa vs 140 GPa). On the shop floor, Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1) welds better (good vs poor) and Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1) sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Mo-La (specialty, $$$$$).

Mo-LaChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1)Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

Mo-La vs Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1): properties

Mo-LaNuclear Grade Hafnium (R1)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

320 GPa46.4 Msi
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

122 GPa17.7 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

265 GPa38.4 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.26

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
445 MPa64.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

560 MPa81.2 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
25%

Reduction in Area

25%
40%

Compressive Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
—

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

6 J4.4 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

228 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

99 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

21 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

240 HV
170 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.2 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³
13.31 g/cm³0.48 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,620°C4,748 °F
2,233°C4,051 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,620°C4,748 °F
2,233°C4,051 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
23 W/m·K13.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

250 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
144 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5.3 µm/m·K2.9 µin/in·°F
5.9 µm/m·K3.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
134 J/g57.6 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,700°C3,092 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

30 % IACS
5.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.7×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.24 µΩ·in
3.31×10⁻⁷ Ω·m13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
88 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
25%

Weldability

20 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

380 MJ/kg163,371 BTU/lb
1,400 MJ/kg601,892 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

25 kg CO₂/kg
95 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

25%
—

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

69 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

31.4 MN·m/kg
10.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

490 kJ/m³
206 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

47.1 mm²/s
12 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

50
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleMo-LaNuclear Grade Hafnium (R1)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMo-LaNuclear Grade Hafnium (R1)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Mo-La vs Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1) — frequently asked

Is Mo-La stronger than Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1)?

Yes. Mo-La has a typical yield strength of 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1) — about 133% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 445 MPa (64.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Mo-La or Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1)?

Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1) is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Mo-La is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Mo-La or Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1)?

Mo-La. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (30/100) for Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1); for welding the order is Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1) first (good, 60/100) then Mo-La (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Mo-La and Nuclear Grade Hafnium (R1) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.