FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal 50Cr-50Ni vs Chromium Alloy 33

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal 50Cr-50Ni and Chromium Alloy 33 are both refractory metal grades. Chromium Alloy 33 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for 50Cr-50Ni, about 26% more; tensile strength follows at 810 MPa (117 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi). Chromium Alloy 33 is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 8% for 50Cr-50Ni, and 50Cr-50Ni is harder (230 HB vs 200 HB). 50Cr-50Ni runs hotter in service (1,100°C vs 450°C continuous) and 50Cr-50Ni conducts heat better (14 W/m·K vs 12 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Chromium Alloy 33 welds better (very good vs poor).

50Cr-50NiChoose it when the part sees heat.

Chromium Alloy 33Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

50Cr-50Ni vs Chromium Alloy 33: properties

50Cr-50NiChromium Alloy 33

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

170 GPa24.7 Msi
167 GPa24.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
810 MPa117 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
50%

Reduction in Area

8%
65%

Compressive Strength

900 MPa131 ksi
—

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
490 MPa71.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

6 J4.4 ft·lbf
180 J133 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

230 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

98 HRB
94 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

20 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

242 HV
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,390°C2,534 °F
1,350°C2,462 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,430°C2,606 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12 W/m·K6.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
14.5 µm/m·K8.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

330 J/g142 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,100°C2,012 °F
450°C842 °F

Min Service Temperature

—
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.7 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
88 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

8%
15%

Weldability

20 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
50 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

9.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
103 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

289 kJ/m³
462 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.9 mm²/s
3.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50Cr-50NiChromium Alloy 33

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50Cr-50NiChromium Alloy 33
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

50Cr-50Ni vs Chromium Alloy 33 — frequently asked

Is Chromium Alloy 33 stronger than 50Cr-50Ni?

Yes. Chromium Alloy 33 has a typical yield strength of 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for 50Cr-50Ni — about 26% more. Tensile strength is 810 MPa (117 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 50Cr-50Ni or Chromium Alloy 33?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 50Cr-50Ni or Chromium Alloy 33?

Chromium Alloy 33, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 22/100 against 15/100 for 50Cr-50Ni; for welding the order is Chromium Alloy 33 first (very good, 72/100) then 50Cr-50Ni (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 50Cr-50Ni and Chromium Alloy 33 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.