FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal 50Cr-50Ni-Cb vs Chromium Alloy 33

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal 50Cr-50Ni-Cb and Chromium Alloy 33 are both refractory metal grades. Chromium Alloy 33 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 390 MPa (56.6 ksi) for 50Cr-50Ni-Cb, about 10% more; tensile strength follows at 810 MPa (117 ksi) vs 590 MPa (85.6 ksi). Chromium Alloy 33 is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 8% for 50Cr-50Ni-Cb. Chromium Alloy 33 is stiffer (200 GPa vs 190 GPa) and 50Cr-50Ni-Cb runs hotter in service (1,100°C vs 450°C continuous). On the shop floor, Chromium Alloy 33 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and Chromium Alloy 33 welds better (very good vs poor).

50Cr-50Ni-CbChoose it when the part sees heat.

Chromium Alloy 33Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

50Cr-50Ni-Cb vs Chromium Alloy 33: properties

50Cr-50Ni-CbChromium Alloy 33

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

190 GPa27.6 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
167 GPa24.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

590 MPa85.6 ksi
810 MPa117 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

390 MPa56.6 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
50%

Reduction in Area

8%
65%

Compressive Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
—

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
490 MPa71.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

9 J6.6 ft·lbf
180 J133 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

210 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

16 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

220 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Hardness, Rockwell B 94 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,370°C2,498 °F
1,350°C2,462 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,430°C2,606 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12 W/m·K6.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
14.5 µm/m·K8.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,100°C2,012 °F
450°C842 °F

Min Service Temperature

0°C32 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.6 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁶ Ω·m41.3 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.05 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 88 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

8%
15%

Weldability

25 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
50 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

135 MJ/kg58,040 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

10.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

76 kN·m/kg
103 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.4 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

400 kJ/m³
462 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.9 mm²/s
3.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50Cr-50Ni-CbChromium Alloy 33

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50Cr-50Ni-CbChromium Alloy 33
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

50Cr-50Ni-Cb vs Chromium Alloy 33 — frequently asked

Is Chromium Alloy 33 stronger than 50Cr-50Ni-Cb?

Yes. Chromium Alloy 33 has a typical yield strength of 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 390 MPa (56.6 ksi) for 50Cr-50Ni-Cb — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 810 MPa (117 ksi) vs 590 MPa (85.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 50Cr-50Ni-Cb or Chromium Alloy 33?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 50Cr-50Ni-Cb or Chromium Alloy 33?

Chromium Alloy 33. Its machinability rates poor (22/100) against not recommended (12/100) for 50Cr-50Ni-Cb; for welding the order is Chromium Alloy 33 first (very good, 72/100) then 50Cr-50Ni-Cb (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 50Cr-50Ni-Cb and Chromium Alloy 33 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.