FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal Argentium 935 vs S800

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal Argentium 935 and S800 are both precious metal grades. S800 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for Argentium 935, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 260 MPa (37.7 ksi). In exchange, Argentium 935 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 35% for S800, and S800 is harder (66 HB vs 48 HB). S800 is stiffer (80 GPa vs 76 GPa) and Argentium 935 conducts electricity better (80 % IACS vs 60 % IACS). On the shop floor, Argentium 935 welds better (excellent vs good).

Argentium 935Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

S800Choose it when strength drives the design.

Argentium 935 vs S800: properties

Argentium 935S800

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

28 GPa4.1 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
35%

Reduction in Area

50%
45%

Shear Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

48 HB
66 HB

Hardness, Vickers

50 HV
70 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
28 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.37

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.3 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³
10.1 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

800°C1,472 °F
779°C1,434 °F

Liquidus Temperature

890°C1,634 °F
820°C1,508 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

330 W/m·K191 BTU/hr·ft·°F
300 W/m·K173 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

235 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
265 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.9 µm/m·K10.5 µin/in·°F
19 µm/m·K10.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

105 J/g45.1 BTU/lb
125 J/g53.7 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

80 % IACS
60 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.15×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.846 µΩ·in
2.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.14 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.05 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
45%

Weldability

90 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

96 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: Castability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,600 MJ/kg687,877 BTU/lb
1,250 MJ/kg537,404 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

120 kg CO₂/kg
85 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

60%
45%

Embodied Water

—
3,000 L/kg359 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
31 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7.4 MN·m/kg
7.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

42 kJ/m³
76 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

136.3 mm²/s
112.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

60
61

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleArgentium 935S800

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityArgentium 935S800
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Argentium 935 vs S800 — frequently asked

Is S800 stronger than Argentium 935?

Yes. S800 has a typical yield strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for Argentium 935 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 260 MPa (37.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Argentium 935 or S800?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Argentium 935 or S800?

Argentium 935. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (50/100) for S800; for welding the order is Argentium 935 first (excellent, 90/100) then S800 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Argentium 935 and S800 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.