FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal AgC10 vs CuCr50

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal AgC10 and CuCr50 are both precious metal grades. CuCr50 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for AgC10, about 3.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi). CuCr50 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 4% for AgC10, and CuCr50 is harder (95 HB vs 30 HB). AgC10 is lighter (7.6 g/cm³ vs 7.95 g/cm³ for CuCr50) and CuCr50 is stiffer (150 GPa vs 55 GPa). On the shop floor, AgC10 machines more easily (good vs poor) and CuCr50 welds better (25 vs 15 out of 100).

AgC10Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

CuCr50Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AgC10 vs CuCr50: properties

AgC10CuCr50

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

55 GPa8 Msi
150 GPa21.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

110 MPa16 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
245 MPa35.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
8%

Compressive Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

30 HB
95 HB

Shear Modulus

—
57 GPa8.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
145 GPa21 Msi

Hardness, Vickers

—
100 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.6 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.95 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

961°C1,762 °F
1,076°C1,969 °F

Liquidus Temperature

961°C1,762 °F
1,863°C3,385 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

280 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F
415 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

100 J/g43 BTU/lb
300 J/g129 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

48 % IACS
43 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.42 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.1 V
-0.22 V

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
32 / 100

Weldability

15 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
22%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,300 MJ/kg558,900 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

90 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
15%

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

14 kN·m/kg
44 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7.2 MN·m/kg
18.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

45 kJ/m³
200 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

94 mm²/s
57.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
37

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAgC10CuCr50

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAgC10CuCr50
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

AgC10 vs CuCr50 — frequently asked

Is CuCr50 stronger than AgC10?

Yes. CuCr50 has a typical yield strength of 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for AgC10 — about 3.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AgC10 or CuCr50?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AgC10 or CuCr50?

AgC10. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (32/100) for CuCr50; for welding the order is CuCr50 first (poor, 25/100) then AgC10 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AgC10 and CuCr50 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.