FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal AgC10 vs B628

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal AgC10 and B628 are both precious metal grades. B628 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for AgC10, about 86% more; tensile strength follows at 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi). B628 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 4% for AgC10, and B628 is harder (62 HB vs 30 HB). AgC10 is lighter (7.6 g/cm³ vs 10 g/cm³ for B628) and B628 is stiffer (92 GPa vs 55 GPa). On the shop floor, B628 welds better (good vs poor).

AgC10Choose it when weight is the constraint.

B628Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AgC10 vs B628: properties

AgC10B628

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

55 GPa8 Msi
92 GPa13.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

110 MPa16 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
25%

Compressive Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

30 HB
62 HB

Shear Modulus

—
34 GPa4.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
110 GPa16 Msi

Reduction in Area

—
55%

Shear Strength

—
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
30 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
65 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.6 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
10 g/cm³0.36 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

961°C1,762 °F
779°C1,434 °F

Liquidus Temperature

961°C1,762 °F
779°C1,434 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
360 W/m·K208 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

280 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F
250 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

100 J/g43 BTU/lb
130 J/g55.9 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

48 % IACS
87 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.42 µΩ·in
1.98×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.78 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.1 V
0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

15 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
98 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
90 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
60%

Castability

—
80 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,300 MJ/kg558,900 BTU/lb
1,100 MJ/kg472,915 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

90 kg CO₂/kg
105 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
60%

Embodied Water

—
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

14 kN·m/kg
28 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7.2 MN·m/kg
9.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

45 kJ/m³
92 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

94 mm²/s
144 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
59

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAgC10B628

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAgC10B628
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

AgC10 vs B628 — frequently asked

Is B628 stronger than AgC10?

Yes. B628 has a typical yield strength of 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for AgC10 — about 86% more. Tensile strength is 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AgC10 or B628?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, AgC10 or B628?

B628. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against poor (15/100) for AgC10.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AgC10 and B628 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.