FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal AgC10 vs AgW50

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal AgC10 and AgW50 are both precious metal grades. AgW50 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for AgC10, about 4.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi). In exchange, AgC10 is the more ductile: elongation 4% versus 3% for AgW50, and AgW50 is harder (120 HB vs 30 HB). AgC10 is lighter (7.6 g/cm³ vs 13.7 g/cm³ for AgW50) and AgW50 is stiffer (180 GPa vs 55 GPa). On the shop floor, AgC10 machines more easily (good vs poor).

AgC10Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

AgW50Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

AgC10 vs AgW50: properties

AgC10AgW50

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

55 GPa8 Msi
180 GPa26.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

110 MPa16 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
3%

Compressive Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

30 HB
120 HB

Shear Modulus

—
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
145 GPa21 Msi

Hardness, Vickers

—
125 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.6 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
13.7 g/cm³0.49 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

961°C1,762 °F
962°C1,764 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 961°C1,762 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F
230 W/m·K133 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

280 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F
185 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

100 J/g43 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

48 % IACS
58 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.42 µΩ·in
2.97×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.17 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.1 V
0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

15 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
10 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,300 MJ/kg558,900 BTU/lb
950 MJ/kg408,427 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

90 kg CO₂/kg
65 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
50%

Embodied Water

—
1,500 L/kg180 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

14 kN·m/kg
31 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7.2 MN·m/kg
13.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

45 kJ/m³
218 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

94 mm²/s
90.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

25
49

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAgC10AgW50

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAgC10AgW50
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

AgC10 vs AgW50 — frequently asked

Is AgW50 stronger than AgC10?

Yes. AgW50 has a typical yield strength of 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for AgC10 — about 4.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AgC10 or AgW50?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AgC10 or AgW50?

AgC10. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (30/100) for AgW50; for welding the order is AgC10 first (poor, 15/100) then AgW50 (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AgC10 and AgW50 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.