FabDigitFabDigit

Ultem 2300 vs Vespel SP-1

Polymer · grade comparison

Ultem 2300 and Vespel SP-1 are both polymer grades. Ultem 2300 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 169 MPa (24.5 ksi) against 86 MPa (12.5 ksi) for Vespel SP-1, about 97% more. In exchange, Vespel SP-1 is the more ductile: elongation 7.5% versus 3% for Ultem 2300. Vespel SP-1 is lighter (1.43 g/cm³ vs 1.51 g/cm³ for Ultem 2300) and Ultem 2300 is stiffer (9 GPa vs 2.5 GPa). On the shop floor, Ultem 2300 welds better (fair vs not recommended).

Ultem 2300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

Vespel SP-1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Ultem 2300 vs Vespel SP-1: properties

Ultem 2300Vespel SP-1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

9 GPa1.3 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.41

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

169 MPa24.5 ksi
86 MPa12.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

169 MPa24.5 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

3%
7.5%

Compressive Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Compressive Modulus

7.5 GPa1.1 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Flexural Strength

230 MPa33.4 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Flexural Modulus

8.6 GPa1.2 Msi
3.1 GPa0.45 Msi

Shear Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

100 J/m1.9 ft·lbf/in
43 J/m0.81 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

114 HRM
95 HRM

Same in both: Hardness, Shore D 90 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.51 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.43 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

217°C423 °F
385°C725 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.22%
0.24%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.9%
1.2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.29 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
1,130 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F
54 µm/m·K30 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

170°C338 °F
260°C500 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-240°C-400 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

216°C421 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

210°C410 °F
360°C680 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

219°C426 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

50%
53%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
482°C900 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.5
3.55

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0022
0.0034

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

175 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

45 / 100
5 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
—

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

380°C716 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

150°C302 °F
—

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100 · Formability (cold) 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

160 MJ/kg68,788 BTU/lb
300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

8 kg CO₂/kg
16 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

112 kN·m/kg
60 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

6 MN·m/kg
1.7 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleUltem 2300

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityUltem 2300Vespel SP-1
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Ultem 2300 vs Vespel SP-1 — frequently asked

Is Ultem 2300 stronger than Vespel SP-1?

Yes. Ultem 2300 has a typical tensile strength of 169 MPa (24.5 ksi) against 86 MPa (12.5 ksi) for Vespel SP-1 — about 97% more.

Which is cheaper, Ultem 2300 or Vespel SP-1?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, Ultem 2300 or Vespel SP-1?

Ultem 2300. Its weldability rates fair (45/100) against not recommended (5/100) for Vespel SP-1.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Ultem 2300 and Vespel SP-1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.