FabDigitFabDigit

RIM PU Foam vs Semi-Rigid PU Foam

Polymer · grade comparison

RIM PU Foam and Semi-Rigid PU Foam are both polymer grades. RIM PU Foam is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) against 0.55 MPa (0.0798 ksi) for Semi-Rigid PU Foam, about 22 times as much. RIM PU Foam is the more ductile: elongation 130% versus 70% for Semi-Rigid PU Foam. Semi-Rigid PU Foam is lighter (0.1 g/cm³ vs 0.6 g/cm³ for RIM PU Foam) and RIM PU Foam is stiffer (0.22 GPa vs 0.01 GPa).

RIM PU FoamChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Semi-Rigid PU FoamChoose it when weight is the constraint.

RIM PU Foam vs Semi-Rigid PU Foam: properties

RIM PU FoamSemi-Rigid PU Foam

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.22 GPa0.03 Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

12 MPa1.7 ksi
0.55 MPa0.08 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

8 MPa1.2 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

130%
70%

Compressive Strength

9 MPa1.3 ksi
0.25 MPa0.04 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.2 GPa0.03 Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Flexural Strength

14 MPa2 ksi
0.6 MPa0.09 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.25 GPa0.04 Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Shear Strength

7 MPa1 ksi
0.2 MPa0.03 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

250 J/m4.7 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore A

92 Shore A
35 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

45 Shore D
—

Tear Strength

32 kN/m183 lbf/in
0.6 kN/m3.4 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

18%
10%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.6 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³
0.1 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

80°C176 °F
60°C140 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.6%
8%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.5%
40%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.08 W/m·K0.05 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

80°C176 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

55°C131 °F
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 20%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

12 kV/mm305 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.8
1.15

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.04
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·cm
1×10¹¹ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

10 / 100
—

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
—

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
1%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

62°C144 °F
45°C113 °F

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

3%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

20 kN·m/kg
6 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.4 MN·m/kg
0.1 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleRIM PU Foam

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityRIM PU FoamSemi-Rigid PU Foam
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

RIM PU Foam vs Semi-Rigid PU Foam — frequently asked

Is RIM PU Foam stronger than Semi-Rigid PU Foam?

Yes. RIM PU Foam has a typical tensile strength of 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) against 0.55 MPa (0.0798 ksi) for Semi-Rigid PU Foam — about 22 times as much.

Which is cheaper, RIM PU Foam or Semi-Rigid PU Foam?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose RIM PU Foam over Semi-Rigid PU Foam?

Pick RIM PU Foam when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick Semi-Rigid PU Foam when weight is the constraint.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in RIM PU Foam and Semi-Rigid PU Foam side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.