FabDigitFabDigit

Rebond Foam vs RIM PU Foam

Polymer · grade comparison

Rebond Foam and RIM PU Foam are both polymer grades. RIM PU Foam is the stronger of the two: yield strength 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) against 0.02 MPa (0.0022 ksi) for Rebond Foam, about 533 times as much; tensile strength follows at 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) vs 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi). RIM PU Foam is the more ductile: elongation 130% versus 60% for Rebond Foam. Rebond Foam is lighter (0.08 g/cm³ vs 0.6 g/cm³ for RIM PU Foam) and RIM PU Foam is stiffer (0.22 GPa vs 8×10⁻⁴ GPa). On the shop floor, Rebond Foam machines more easily (very good vs good).

Rebond FoamChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

RIM PU FoamChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Rebond Foam vs RIM PU Foam: properties

Rebond FoamRIM PU Foam

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

8×10⁻⁴ GPa1.16×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.22 GPa0.03 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.15 MPa0.02 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

0.02 MPa0 ksi
8 MPa1.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

60%
130%

Compressive Strength

0.03 MPa0 ksi
9 MPa1.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

6×10⁻⁴ GPa8.7×10⁻⁵ Msi
0.2 GPa0.03 Msi

Shear Strength

0.08 MPa0.01 ksi
7 MPa1 ksi

Hardness, Shore A

12 Shore A
92 Shore A

Tear Strength

0.4 kN/m2.3 lbf/in
32 kN/m183 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

10%
18%

Flexural Strength

—
14 MPa2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

—
250 J/m4.7 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

—
45 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.08 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.6 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-50°C-58 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

—
0.6%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
2.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.05 W/m·K0.03 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.08 W/m·K0.05 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

90°C194 °F
95°C203 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

120°C248 °F
130°C266 °F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

—
120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
55°C131 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

—
12 kV/mm305 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
2.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.04

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹³ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
72 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

20 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

15 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

—
35 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
40°C104 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
62°C144 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

20 MJ/kg8,598 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.3 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

90%
3%

Embodied Water

—
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

2 kN·m/kg
20 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0 MN·m/kg
0.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

0 kJ/m³
145 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.4 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleRebond FoamRIM PU Foam

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityRebond FoamRIM PU Foam
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Rebond Foam vs RIM PU Foam — frequently asked

Is RIM PU Foam stronger than Rebond Foam?

Yes. RIM PU Foam has a typical yield strength of 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) against 0.02 MPa (0.0022 ksi) for Rebond Foam — about 533 times as much. Tensile strength is 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) vs 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Rebond Foam or RIM PU Foam?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Rebond Foam or RIM PU Foam?

Rebond Foam. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (55/100) for RIM PU Foam; for welding the order is Rebond Foam first (poor, 15/100) then RIM PU Foam (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Rebond Foam and RIM PU Foam side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.