FabDigitFabDigit

Reticulated PU Foam vs RIM PU Foam

Polymer · grade comparison

Reticulated PU Foam and RIM PU Foam are both polymer grades. RIM PU Foam is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) against 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi) for Reticulated PU Foam, about 80 times as much. In exchange, Reticulated PU Foam is the more ductile: elongation 180% versus 130% for RIM PU Foam. Reticulated PU Foam is lighter (0.03 g/cm³ vs 0.6 g/cm³ for RIM PU Foam) and RIM PU Foam is stiffer (0.22 GPa vs 3×10⁻⁵ GPa). On the shop floor, Reticulated PU Foam machines more easily (very good vs good), Reticulated PU Foam welds better (good vs not recommended), and RIM PU Foam sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Reticulated PU Foam (high, $$$$).

Reticulated PU FoamChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

RIM PU FoamChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Reticulated PU Foam vs RIM PU Foam: properties

Reticulated PU FoamRIM PU Foam

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3×10⁻⁵ GPa4.35×10⁻⁶ Msi
0.22 GPa0.03 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.15 MPa0.02 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

180%
130%

Compressive Strength

0 MPa5.08×10⁻⁴ ksi
9 MPa1.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3×10⁻⁵ GPa4.35×10⁻⁶ Msi
0.2 GPa0.03 Msi

Tear Strength

0.45 kN/m2.6 lbf/in
32 kN/m183 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

8%
18%

Poisson's Ratio

—
0.35

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
8 MPa1.2 ksi

Flexural Strength

—
14 MPa2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Shear Strength

—
7 MPa1 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

—
250 J/m4.7 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

—
92 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

—
45 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.03 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.6 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-40°C-40 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

—
0.6%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
2.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.08 W/m·K0.05 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
95°C203 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
20%

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

—
120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
55°C131 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 130°C266 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.06
2.8

Dielectric Strength

—
12 kV/mm305 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.04

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹³ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
72 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

60 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

—
35 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
40°C104 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
62°C144 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
3%

Embodied Water

—
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

5 kN·m/kg
20 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0 MN·m/kg
0.4 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.9 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleRIM PU Foam

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityReticulated PU FoamRIM PU Foam
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Reticulated PU Foam vs RIM PU Foam — frequently asked

Is RIM PU Foam stronger than Reticulated PU Foam?

Yes. RIM PU Foam has a typical tensile strength of 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) against 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi) for Reticulated PU Foam — about 80 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Reticulated PU Foam or RIM PU Foam?

RIM PU Foam is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Reticulated PU Foam is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Reticulated PU Foam or RIM PU Foam?

Reticulated PU Foam. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (55/100) for RIM PU Foam; for welding the order is Reticulated PU Foam first (good, 60/100) then RIM PU Foam (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Reticulated PU Foam and RIM PU Foam side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.