FabDigitFabDigit

PPE-GF30 vs PPE/PPO

Polymer · grade comparison

PPE-GF30 and PPE/PPO are both polymer grades. PPE-GF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for PPE/PPO, about 100% more. In exchange, PPE/PPO is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 2.5% for PPE-GF30, and PPE-GF30 is harder (88 Shore D vs 80 Shore D). PPE/PPO is lighter (1.06 g/cm³ vs 1.28 g/cm³ for PPE-GF30) and PPE-GF30 is stiffer (9 GPa vs 2.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PPE/PPO machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100) and PPE/PPO welds better (very good vs fair).

PPE-GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PPE/PPOChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PPE-GF30 vs PPE/PPO: properties

PPE-GF30PPE/PPO

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

9 GPa1.3 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
50%

Compressive Strength

120 MPa17.4 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

8 GPa1.2 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Flexural Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

8.3 GPa1.2 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Strength

68 MPa9.9 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
220 J/m4.1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

88 Shore D
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

88 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
119 HRR

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.28 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.06 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

148°C298 °F
150°C302 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.4%
0.2%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.07%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

110°C230 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

158°C316 °F
135°C275 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

145°C293 °F
112°C234 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

160°C320 °F
140°C284 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

25%
24%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

145°C293 °F
130°C266 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
2.6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.004
0.001

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

250 V
400 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.2%
0.6%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

290°C554 °F
280°C536 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Melt Flow Rate 8 g/10 min

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

94 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

7 MN·m/kg
2.4 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePPE/PPO

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPPE-GF30PPE/PPO
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PPE-GF30 vs PPE/PPO — frequently asked

Is PPE-GF30 stronger than PPE/PPO?

Yes. PPE-GF30 has a typical tensile strength of 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for PPE/PPO — about 100% more.

Which is cheaper, PPE-GF30 or PPE/PPO?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PPE-GF30 or PPE/PPO?

PPE/PPO, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for PPE-GF30; for welding the order is PPE/PPO first (very good, 70/100) then PPE-GF30 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PPE-GF30 and PPE/PPO side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.