FabDigitFabDigit

PP-R vs PP-T20

Polymer · grade comparison

PP-R and PP-T20 are both polymer grades. PP-T20 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 29 MPa (4.21 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for PP-R, about 16% more; tensile strength follows at 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 26 MPa (3.77 ksi). In exchange, PP-R is the more ductile: elongation 600% versus 12% for PP-T20, and PP-T20 is harder (72 Shore D vs 65 Shore D). PP-R is lighter (0.91 g/cm³ vs 1.05 g/cm³ for PP-T20) and PP-T20 is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 0.85 GPa). On the shop floor, PP-R welds better (excellent vs very good).

PP-RChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PP-T20Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PP-R vs PP-T20: properties

PP-RPP-T20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.3 GPa0.04 Msi
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.42 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.43
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

26 MPa3.8 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

25 MPa3.6 ksi
29 MPa4.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

600%
12%

Compressive Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

30 MPa4.4 ksi
44 MPa6.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
2.5 GPa0.36 Msi

Shear Strength

18 MPa2.6 ksi
24 MPa3.5 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

80 J/m1.5 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
72 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

85 HRR
97 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.91 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
1.05 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

148°C298 °F
165°C329 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-12°C10 °F
-10°C14 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.02%
0.05%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.1%
0.15%

Refractive Index

1.49
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.27 W/m·K0.16 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F
80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
105°C221 °F

Min Service Temperature

-10°C14 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

80°C176 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

52°C126 °F
65°C149 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

80°C176 °F
152°C306 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

27 kV/mm686 V/mil
24 kV/mm610 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.3
2.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

4×10⁻⁴
0.0012

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

20 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
58 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.6%
1.1%

Melt Flow Rate

0.3 g/10 min
12 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
225°C437 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
45°C113 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.9 MN·m/kg
2.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

368 kJ/m³
175 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 29 kN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePP-RPP-T20

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPP-RPP-T20
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PP-R vs PP-T20 — frequently asked

Is PP-T20 stronger than PP-R?

Yes. PP-T20 has a typical yield strength of 29 MPa (4.21 ksi) against 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) for PP-R — about 16% more. Tensile strength is 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 26 MPa (3.77 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PP-R or PP-T20?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, PP-R or PP-T20?

PP-R. Its weldability rates excellent (95/100) against very good (70/100) for PP-T20.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PP-R and PP-T20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.