FabDigitFabDigit

POM GF30 vs POM MoS2

Polymer · POM grade comparison

POM GF30 and POM MoS2 are two grades of the same polymer grade, POM: GF30 (30% glass fiber reinforced) versus MoS2 (molybdenum disulfide filled). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. POM GF30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for POM MoS2, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 135 MPa (19.6 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi). In exchange, POM MoS2 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 2.5% for POM GF30. POM MoS2 is lighter (1.43 g/cm³ vs 1.63 g/cm³ for POM GF30) and POM GF30 is stiffer (9.5 GPa vs 3 GPa). On the shop floor, POM MoS2 machines more easily (excellent vs good) and POM GF30 welds better (good vs fair).

POM GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

POM MoS2Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

POM GF30 vs POM MoS2: properties

POM GF30POM MoS2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

9.5 GPa1.4 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

135 MPa19.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

62 MPa9 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
15%

Compressive Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Flexural Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
86 MPa12.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

8.8 GPa1.3 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
53 MPa7.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

75 J/m1.4 ft·lbf/in
55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

81 Shore D
82 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

80 HRM
82 HRM

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1.1 GPa0.15 Msi · Bulk Modulus 3 GPa0.45 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.35 · Compressive Modulus 2.7 GPa0.39 Msi · Hardness, Rockwell R 120 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.63 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.43 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 166°C331 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) -60°C-76 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.22% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.8%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.31 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

35 µm/m·K19.4 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
100°C212 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

158°C316 °F
160°C320 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

163°C325 °F
108°C226 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

160°C320 °F
162°C324 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 15% · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.7 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.005 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 70 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
90 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
2%

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100 · Melt Flow Rate 9 g/10 min · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 200°C392 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 85°C185 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePOM

POM GF30 vs POM MoS2 — frequently asked

Is POM GF30 stronger than POM MoS2?

Yes. POM GF30 has a typical yield strength of 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) for POM MoS2 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 135 MPa (19.6 ksi) vs 60 MPa (8.7 ksi).

Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, GF30 or MoS2?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

Which is easier to machine, POM GF30 or POM MoS2?

POM MoS2. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against good (55/100) for POM GF30; for welding the order is POM GF30 first (good, 55/100) then POM MoS2 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in POM GF30 and POM MoS2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.