FabDigitFabDigit

POM ESD vs POM GF30

Polymer · POM grade comparison

POM ESD and POM GF30 are two grades of the same polymer grade, POM: ESD (carbon-black conductive / antistatic) versus GF30 (30% glass fiber reinforced). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. POM GF30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 47 MPa (6.82 ksi) for POM ESD, about 32% more; tensile strength follows at 135 MPa (19.6 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). In exchange, POM ESD is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 2.5% for POM GF30. POM ESD is lighter (1.45 g/cm³ vs 1.63 g/cm³ for POM GF30) and POM GF30 is stiffer (9.5 GPa vs 3.2 GPa). On the shop floor, POM ESD machines more easily (very good vs good) and POM GF30 welds better (good vs fair).

POM ESDChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

POM GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

POM ESD vs POM GF30: properties

POM ESDPOM GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.2 GPa0.46 Msi
9.5 GPa1.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
135 MPa19.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

47 MPa6.8 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Flexural Strength

72 MPa10.4 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
8.8 GPa1.3 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in
75 J/m1.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

82 HRM
80 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
120 HRR

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1.1 GPa0.15 Msi · Bulk Modulus 3 GPa0.45 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.35 · Compressive Modulus 2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.45 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.63 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 166°C331 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) -60°C-76 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.22% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.8%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.4 W/m·K0.23 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.31 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F
35 µm/m·K19.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

90°C194 °F
95°C203 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

152°C306 °F
158°C316 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

100°C212 °F
163°C325 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

156°C313 °F
160°C320 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

16%
15%

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

100 Ω·m3.94×10⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

10,000 Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

100,000 Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.7 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.005 · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

70 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
0.6%

Melt Flow Rate

7 g/10 min
9 g/10 min

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100 · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 200°C392 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 85°C185 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 200 L/kg24 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePOM

POM ESD vs POM GF30 — frequently asked

Is POM GF30 stronger than POM ESD?

Yes. POM GF30 has a typical yield strength of 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 47 MPa (6.82 ksi) for POM ESD — about 32% more. Tensile strength is 135 MPa (19.6 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, ESD or GF30?

Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.

Which is easier to machine, POM ESD or POM GF30?

POM ESD. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (55/100) for POM GF30; for welding the order is POM GF30 first (good, 55/100) then POM ESD (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in POM ESD and POM GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.