PAR BLEND-PC vs PAR GF30
Polymer · PAR grade comparison
PAR BLEND-PC and PAR GF30 are two grades of the same polymer grade, PAR: BLEND-PC (PAR/PC alloy) versus GF30 (30 % glass-fiber reinforced). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. PAR GF30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for PAR BLEND-PC, about 10% more; tensile strength follows at 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) vs 66 MPa (9.57 ksi). In exchange, PAR BLEND-PC is the more ductile: elongation 80% versus 2.5% for PAR GF30. PAR BLEND-PC is lighter (1.2 g/cm³ vs 1.45 g/cm³ for PAR GF30) and PAR GF30 is stiffer (8.5 GPa vs 2.2 GPa). On the shop floor, PAR BLEND-PC machines more easily (good vs fair).
PAR BLEND-PCChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.
PAR GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.
PAR BLEND-PC vs PAR GF30: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all polymer grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Flexural Strength
Flexural Modulus
Shear Strength
Izod Impact, Notched
Hardness, Shore D
Hardness, Rockwell M
Hardness, Rockwell R
Same in both: Shear Modulus 0.75 GPa0.11 Msi · Bulk Modulus 4 GPa0.51 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.4 · Compressive Modulus 2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Glass Transition (Tg)
Light Transmission
Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.26% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.8% · Refractive Index 1.61
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa
Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa
Vicat Softening Point (B50)
Limiting Oxygen Index
Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 180°C356 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 20 kV/mm508 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.012 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 200 V
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 90 / 100
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Mold Shrinkage
Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)
Same in both: Polishability 75 / 100 · Mold Temperature (typ.) 130°C266 °F
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 7.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
PAR BLEND-PC vs PAR GF30 — frequently asked
Is PAR GF30 stronger than PAR BLEND-PC?
Yes. PAR GF30 has a typical yield strength of 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for PAR BLEND-PC — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) vs 66 MPa (9.57 ksi).
Which grade does FabDigit quote by default, BLEND-PC or GF30?
Specify the condition in the material field or the drawing note; FabDigit prices the quote for the state you call out.
Which is easier to machine, PAR BLEND-PC or PAR GF30?
PAR BLEND-PC. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (42/100) for PAR GF30; for welding the order is PAR GF30 first (good, 60/100) then PAR BLEND-PC (good, 55/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PAR BLEND-PC and PAR GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.