FabDigitFabDigit

GB/T 10801.1 Type I vs JIS A9511 EPS

Polymer · grade comparison

GB/T 10801.1 Type I and JIS A9511 EPS are both polymer grades. JIS A9511 EPS is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) against 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) for GB/T 10801.1 Type I, about 54% more. In exchange, GB/T 10801.1 Type I is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 1.5% for JIS A9511 EPS. GB/T 10801.1 Type I is lighter (0.02 g/cm³ vs 0.02 g/cm³ for JIS A9511 EPS) and JIS A9511 EPS is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, GB/T 10801.1 Type I welds better (fair vs poor).

GB/T 10801.1 Type IChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

JIS A9511 EPSChoose it when strength drives the design.

GB/T 10801.1 Type I vs JIS A9511 EPS: properties

GB/T 10801.1 Type IJIS A9511 EPS

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0 GPa3.63×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Shear Modulus

0 GPa1.6×10⁻⁴ Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.13 MPa0.02 ksi
0.2 MPa0.03 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
1.5%

Compressive Strength

0.08 MPa0.01 ksi
0.08 MPa0.01 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0 GPa3.19×10⁻⁴ Msi
0 GPa6.53×10⁻⁴ Msi

Flexural Strength

0.18 MPa0.03 ksi
0.15 MPa0.02 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0 GPa3.63×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.01 GPa7.98×10⁻⁴ Msi

Shear Strength

0.07 MPa0.01 ksi
0.1 MPa0.01 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
0.18 MPa0.03 ksi

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
4%

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.1

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.02 g/cm³6.5×10⁻⁴ lb/in³
0.02 g/cm³7.23×10⁻⁴ lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

2%
1.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

4.5%
4%

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 100°C212 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
75°C167 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

95°C203 °F
98°C208 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

80°C176 °F
85°C185 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

2.2 kV/mm55.9 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.03
1.04

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
2×10⁻⁴

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 80 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
90 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

5 / 100
—

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.45%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

112°C234 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
115°C239 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

160 L/kg19.2 gal/lb
165 L/kg19.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

7 kN·m/kg
10 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

1.6 mm²/s
1.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleJIS A9511 EPS

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGB/T 10801.1 Type IJIS A9511 EPS
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

GB/T 10801.1 Type I vs JIS A9511 EPS — frequently asked

Is JIS A9511 EPS stronger than GB/T 10801.1 Type I?

Yes. JIS A9511 EPS has a typical tensile strength of 0.2 MPa (0.029 ksi) against 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) for GB/T 10801.1 Type I — about 54% more.

Which is cheaper, GB/T 10801.1 Type I or JIS A9511 EPS?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, GB/T 10801.1 Type I or JIS A9511 EPS?

JIS A9511 EPS, by a small margin. Both rate excellent for machinability — 90/100 against 85/100 for GB/T 10801.1 Type I; for welding the order is GB/T 10801.1 Type I first (fair, 45/100) then JIS A9511 EPS (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in GB/T 10801.1 Type I and JIS A9511 EPS side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.