FabDigitFabDigit

Flexible Resin vs Formlabs Tough 2000

Polymer · grade comparison

Flexible Resin and Tough 2000 are both polymer grades. Tough 2000 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.29 ksi) for Flexible Resin, about 5.6 times as much. In exchange, Flexible Resin is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 22% for Tough 2000, and Tough 2000 is harder (80 Shore D vs 30 Shore D). Tough 2000 is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 0.01 GPa) and Flexible Resin runs hotter in service (65°C vs 50°C continuous). On the shop floor, Tough 2000 machines more easily (good vs poor) and Tough 2000 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Flexible Resin (premium, $$$).

Flexible ResinChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Tough 2000Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

Flexible Resin vs Tough 2000: properties

Flexible ResinTough 2000

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.48
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

9 MPa1.3 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

120%
22%

Compressive Strength

5 MPa0.65 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Strength

6 MPa0.87 ksi
—

Hardness, Shore A

80 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

30 Shore D
80 Shore D

Tear Strength

24 kN/m137 lbf/in
—

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

4%
—

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
44 MPa6.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

—
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
1.9 GPa0.28 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

—
38 J/m0.71 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
103 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

5°C41 °F
58°C136 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.2%
0.8%

Refractive Index

1.5
1.51

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
1.8%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,650 J/kg·K0.39 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
50°C122 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

60°C140 °F
49°C120 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

85°C185 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
42°C108 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 19%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

14 kV/mm356 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4
3.4

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.03

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

25 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.5%
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
—

Weldability

—
5 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

8 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
0

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFormlabs Tough 2000Flexible Resin

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityFlexible ResinTough 2000
Default conditionShore A 80ABS-like
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Injection molding and 3D printing. Both take the same 12 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

Flexible Resin vs Tough 2000 — frequently asked

Is Tough 2000 stronger than Flexible Resin?

Yes. Tough 2000 has a typical tensile strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.29 ksi) for Flexible Resin — about 5.6 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Flexible Resin or Tough 2000?

Tough 2000 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Flexible Resin is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Flexible Resin or Tough 2000?

Tough 2000. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (15/100) for Flexible Resin.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Flexible Resin and Tough 2000 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.