FabDigitFabDigit

Fire-Retardant Resin vs Flexible Resin

Polymer · grade comparison

Fire-Retardant Resin and Flexible Resin are both polymer grades. Fire-Retardant Resin is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.29 ksi) for Flexible Resin, about 6.7 times as much. In exchange, Flexible Resin is the more ductile: elongation 120% versus 4% for Fire-Retardant Resin, and Fire-Retardant Resin is harder (85 Shore D vs 30 Shore D). Flexible Resin is lighter (1.12 g/cm³ vs 1.32 g/cm³ for Fire-Retardant Resin) and Fire-Retardant Resin is stiffer (3.3 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, Fire-Retardant Resin machines more easily (fair vs poor) and Flexible Resin sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Fire-Retardant Resin (high, $$$$).

Fire-Retardant ResinChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Flexible ResinChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Fire-Retardant Resin vs Flexible Resin: properties

Fire-Retardant ResinFlexible Resin

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.48

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
9 MPa1.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
120%

Compressive Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
5 MPa0.65 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
—

Izod Impact, Notched

22 J/m0.41 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
30 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

85 HRM
—

Shear Strength

—
6 MPa0.87 ksi

Hardness, Shore A

—
80 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
24 kN/m137 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
4%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.32 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

100°C212 °F
5°C41 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.6%
1.2%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.6%
—

Refractive Index

—
1.5

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,650 J/kg·K0.39 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F
180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
65°C149 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

108°C226 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

90°C194 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

30%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
85°C185 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

18 kV/mm457 V/mil
14 kV/mm356 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.6
4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

75 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.5%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

45 kN·m/kg
8 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.5 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
1

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFlexible Resin

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityFire-Retardant ResinFlexible Resin
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Shore A 80
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Fire-Retardant Resin vs Flexible Resin — frequently asked

Is Fire-Retardant Resin stronger than Flexible Resin?

Yes. Fire-Retardant Resin has a typical tensile strength of 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.29 ksi) for Flexible Resin — about 6.7 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Fire-Retardant Resin or Flexible Resin?

Flexible Resin is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Fire-Retardant Resin is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Fire-Retardant Resin or Flexible Resin?

Fire-Retardant Resin. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (15/100) for Flexible Resin.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Fire-Retardant Resin and Flexible Resin side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.