FabDigitFabDigit

DAP vs PF

Polymer · grade comparison

DAP and PF are both polymer grades. DAP is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for PF, about 6% more. PF is lighter (1.4 g/cm³ vs 1.8 g/cm³ for DAP) and DAP is stiffer (10.5 GPa vs 7 GPa). On the shop floor, PF machines more easily (good vs fair) and PF sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than DAP (high, $$$$).

DAPChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PFChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

DAP vs PF: properties

DAPPF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

10.5 GPa1.5 Msi
7 GPa1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Flexural Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
7.5 GPa1.1 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in
20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

110 HRM
108 HRM

Shear Modulus

—
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
6 GPa0.87 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
6.5 GPa0.94 Msi

Shear Strength

—
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
1 MPa·√m0.91 ksi·√in

Same in both: Elongation at Break 0.6% · Compressive Strength 200 MPa29 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.8 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.4 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
1.4%

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 160°C320 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.5 W/m·K0.29 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
35 µm/m·K19.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

285°C545 °F
185°C365 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

265°C509 °F
165°C329 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

230°C446 °F
190°C374 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 32%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
14 kV/mm356 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.3
5.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.011
0.04

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹² Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

200 V
150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
68 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

0 / 100
5 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
0.6%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
175°C347 °F

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
85°C185 °F

Same in both: Weldability 0 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
87 MJ/kg37,403 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
37 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.8 MN·m/kg
5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityDAPPF
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

DAP vs PF — frequently asked

Is DAP stronger than PF?

Yes. DAP has a typical tensile strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for PF — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, DAP or PF?

PF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while DAP is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, DAP or PF?

PF. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (40/100) for DAP.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in DAP and PF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.