FabDigitFabDigit

DAIP vs PF

Polymer · grade comparison

DAIP and PF are both polymer grades. DAIP is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for PF, about 6% more. PF is lighter (1.4 g/cm³ vs 1.8 g/cm³ for DAIP) and DAIP is stiffer (11 GPa vs 7 GPa). On the shop floor, PF machines more easily (good vs fair) and PF sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than DAIP (high, $$$$).

DAIPChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PFChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

DAIP vs PF: properties

DAIPPF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
7 GPa1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Flexural Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

11.5 GPa1.7 Msi
7.5 GPa1.1 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

75 J/m1.4 ft·lbf/in
20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in

Shear Modulus

—
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
6 GPa0.87 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
6.5 GPa0.94 Msi

Shear Strength

—
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
1 MPa·√m0.91 ksi·√in

Same in both: Elongation at Break 0.6% · Compressive Strength 200 MPa29 ksi · Hardness, Rockwell M 108 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.8 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.4 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

190°C374 °F
160°C320 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.25%
0.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.7%
1.4%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.42 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

30 µm/m·K16.7 µin/in·°F
35 µm/m·K19.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

205°C401 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-65°C-85 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

300°C572 °F
185°C365 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

290°C554 °F
165°C329 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

34%
32%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

260°C500 °F
190°C374 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
14 kV/mm356 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.4
5.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.01
0.04

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹² Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

400 V
150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
68 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

70 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

3 / 100
0 / 100

Formability (cold)

3 / 100
5 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.35%
0.6%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

105°C221 °F
85°C185 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

165°C329 °F
175°C347 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
87 MJ/kg37,403 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
37 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

6.1 MN·m/kg
5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityDAIPPF
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

DAIP vs PF — frequently asked

Is DAIP stronger than PF?

Yes. DAIP has a typical tensile strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for PF — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, DAIP or PF?

PF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while DAIP is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, DAIP or PF?

PF. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (40/100) for DAIP.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in DAIP and PF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.