FabDigitFabDigit

Cyanate Ester vs Epoxy

Polymer · grade comparison

Cyanate Ester and Epoxy are both polymer grades. Cyanate Ester is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) for Epoxy, about 23% more. In exchange, Epoxy is the more ductile: elongation 4% versus 2.6% for Cyanate Ester. Cyanate Ester runs hotter in service (200°C vs 130°C continuous) and Cyanate Ester conducts heat better (0.24 W/m·K vs 0.2 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Epoxy sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Cyanate Ester (high, $$$$).

Cyanate EsterChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

EpoxyChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Cyanate Ester vs Epoxy: properties

Cyanate EsterEpoxy

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.52 Msi
5 GPa0.65 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.6%
4%

Compressive Strength

175 MPa25.4 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.3 GPa0.48 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Flexural Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.2 GPa0.46 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Hardness, Shore D

89 Shore D
85 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

110 HRM
100 HRM

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1.2 GPa0.17 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.35 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 0.6 MPa·√m0.55 ksi·√in · Izod Impact, Notched 20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.21 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

270°C518 °F
120°C248 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.5%
0.15%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.3%
1.6%

Refractive Index

1.57
1.56

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.24 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,150 J/kg·K0.27 BTU/lb·°F
1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

63 µm/m·K35 µin/in·°F
60 µm/m·K33.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
130°C266 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

265°C509 °F
130°C266 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

250°C482 °F
110°C230 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

33%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
180°C356 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
3.6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.004
0.02

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

200 V
300 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

65 / 100
75 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
0.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

90°C194 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
165°C329 °F

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100 · Weldability 0 / 100 · Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

185 MJ/kg79,536 BTU/lb
137 MJ/kg58,899 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

9.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

66 kN·m/kg
54 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
2.5 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCyanate EsterEpoxy
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Cyanate Ester vs Epoxy — frequently asked

Is Cyanate Ester stronger than Epoxy?

Yes. Cyanate Ester has a typical tensile strength of 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) against 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) for Epoxy — about 23% more.

Which is cheaper, Cyanate Ester or Epoxy?

Epoxy is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Cyanate Ester is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose Cyanate Ester over Epoxy?

Pick Cyanate Ester when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat. Pick Epoxy when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Cyanate Ester and Epoxy side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.