FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Inconel 625 vs Nimonic 75

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Inconel 625 and Nimonic 75 are both nickel alloy grades. Inconel 625 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for Nimonic 75, about 63% more; tensile strength follows at 930 MPa (135 ksi) vs 750 MPa (109 ksi). Inconel 625 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 40% for Nimonic 75, and Inconel 625 is harder (190 HB vs 180 HB). Nimonic 75 runs hotter in service (950°C vs 650°C continuous) and Nimonic 75 conducts heat better (11.7 W/m·K vs 9.8 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Nimonic 75 machines more easily (28 vs 18 out of 100) and Inconel 625 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Nimonic 75 (high, $$$$).

Inconel 625Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Nimonic 75Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

Inconel 625 vs Nimonic 75: properties

Inconel 625Nimonic 75

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

207.5 GPa30.1 Msi
206 GPa29.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
172 GPa24.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

930 MPa135 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

490 MPa71.1 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
40%

Reduction in Area

55%
50%

Compressive Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
—

Shear Strength

600 MPa87 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

120 J88.5 ft·lbf
110 J81.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
88 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

200 HV
190 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 79 GPa11.5 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.44 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
8.37 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,290°C2,354 °F
1,340°C2,444 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,350°C2,462 °F
1,380°C2,516 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

9.8 W/m·K5.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11.7 W/m·K6.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

410 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.8 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F
12.7 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

650°C1,202 °F
950°C1,742 °F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.3 % IACS
1.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.29×10⁻⁶ Ω·m50.8 µΩ·in
1.09×10⁻⁶ Ω·m42.9 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
15%

Weldability

88 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
78 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

225 MJ/kg96,733 BTU/lb
160 MJ/kg68,788 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

110 kN·m/kg
90 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

579 kJ/m³
218 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.8 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 24.6 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleInconel 625Nimonic 75

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityInconel 625Nimonic 75
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall1.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—

They share 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Inconel 625 vs Nimonic 75 — frequently asked

Is Inconel 625 stronger than Nimonic 75?

Yes. Inconel 625 has a typical yield strength of 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for Nimonic 75 — about 63% more. Tensile strength is 930 MPa (135 ksi) vs 750 MPa (109 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Inconel 625 or Nimonic 75?

Inconel 625 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Nimonic 75 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Inconel 625 or Nimonic 75?

Nimonic 75, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 18/100 for Inconel 625; for welding the order is Inconel 625 first (excellent, 88/100) then Nimonic 75 (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Inconel 625 and Nimonic 75 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.