FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Alloy 684 vs Inconel 725

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Alloy 684 and Inconel 725 are both nickel alloy grades. Alloy 684 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 1,310 MPa (190 ksi) against 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) for Inconel 725, about 6% more. In exchange, Inconel 725 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 16% for Alloy 684, and Alloy 684 is harder (355 HB vs 330 HB). Alloy 684 is lighter (8.02 g/cm³ vs 8.31 g/cm³ for Inconel 725) and Alloy 684 runs hotter in service (870°C vs 650°C continuous). On the shop floor, Inconel 725 welds better (good vs poor).

Alloy 684Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Inconel 725Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

Alloy 684 vs Inconel 725: properties

Alloy 684Inconel 725

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

213 GPa30.9 Msi
204 GPa29.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

178 GPa25.8 Msi
162 GPa23.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,310 MPa190 ksi
1,240 MPa180 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

860 MPa125 ksi
890 MPa129 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
25%

Reduction in Area

20%
42%

Compressive Strength

900 MPa131 ksi
920 MPa133 ksi

Shear Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
740 MPa107 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

355 HB
330 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

38 HRC
35 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

375 HV
345 HV

Same in both: Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 480 MPa69.6 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.02 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8.31 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,300°C2,372 °F
1,271°C2,320 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,395°C2,543 °F
1,343°C2,449 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

11 W/m·K6.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.8 W/m·K6.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
435 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.1 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
12.8 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

870°C1,598 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 290 J/g125 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
1.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.24×10⁻⁶ Ω·m48.8 µΩ·in
1.2×10⁻⁶ Ω·m47.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
88 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
14 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

8%
10%

Weldability

20 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

165 MJ/kg70,937 BTU/lb
250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,500 L/kg180 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

163 kN·m/kg
149 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.6 MN·m/kg
24.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,736 kJ/m³
1,941 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.3 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 684Inconel 725

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 684Inconel 725
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Alloy 684 vs Inconel 725 — frequently asked

Is Alloy 684 stronger than Inconel 725?

Yes. Alloy 684 has a typical tensile strength of 1,310 MPa (190 ksi) against 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) for Inconel 725 — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, Alloy 684 or Inconel 725?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, Alloy 684 or Inconel 725?

Inconel 725. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against poor (20/100) for Alloy 684.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 684 and Inconel 725 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.