FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Alloy 684 vs Alloy 689

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Alloy 684 and Alloy 689 are both nickel alloy grades. Alloy 684 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 1,310 MPa (190 ksi) against 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) for Alloy 689, about 6% more. Alloy 684 is harder — 355 HB against 331 HB for Alloy 689 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Alloy 684 is lighter (8.02 g/cm³ vs 8.27 g/cm³ for Alloy 689). On the shop floor, Alloy 689 welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100) and Alloy 689 forms better (fair vs poor).

Alloy 684Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Alloy 689Choose it when it will be welded.

Alloy 684 vs Alloy 689: properties

Alloy 684Alloy 689

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

213 GPa30.9 Msi
206 GPa29.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

178 GPa25.8 Msi
172 GPa24.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,310 MPa190 ksi
1,240 MPa180 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

860 MPa125 ksi
840 MPa122 ksi

Compressive Strength

900 MPa131 ksi
—

Shear Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

355 HB
331 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

38 HRC
35 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

375 HV
350 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Elongation at Break 16% · Reduction in Area 20% · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 480 MPa69.6 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.02 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8.27 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,300°C2,372 °F
1,315°C2,399 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,395°C2,543 °F
1,385°C2,525 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

11 W/m·K6.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11.7 W/m·K6.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.1 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

870°C1,598 °F
815°C1,499 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 290 J/g125 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
1.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.24×10⁻⁶ Ω·m48.8 µΩ·in
1.19×10⁻⁶ Ω·m46.9 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
13 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

8%
12%

Weldability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

165 MJ/kg70,937 BTU/lb
230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
15 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,500 L/kg180 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

163 kN·m/kg
150 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.6 MN·m/kg
24.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,736 kJ/m³
1,713 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.3 mm²/s
3.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 684Alloy 689

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 684Alloy 689
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Alloy 684 vs Alloy 689 — frequently asked

Is Alloy 684 stronger than Alloy 689?

Yes. Alloy 684 has a typical tensile strength of 1,310 MPa (190 ksi) against 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) for Alloy 689 — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, Alloy 684 or Alloy 689?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, Alloy 684 or Alloy 689?

Alloy 689. Its weldability rates poor (30/100) against poor (20/100) for Alloy 684.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 684 and Alloy 689 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.