FabDigitFabDigit

Oak vs SPF

Natural Material · grade comparison

Oak and SPF are both natural material grades. Oak is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for SPF, about 4.3 times as much. SPF is lighter (0.42 g/cm³ vs 0.72 g/cm³ for Oak) and Oak is stiffer (12.3 GPa vs 9.7 GPa). On the shop floor, SPF machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and SPF sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Oak (standard, $$).

OakChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

SPFChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

Oak vs SPF: properties

OakSPF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

12.3 GPa1.8 Msi
9.7 GPa1.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Compressive Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Shear Strength

14 MPa2 ksi
7 MPa0.94 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.5 MPa·√m0.46 ksi·√in
0.4 MPa·√m0.36 ksi·√in

Hardness, Mohs

2.5
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.37 · Elongation at Break 1%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.72 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.42 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Porosity

52%
70%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.12 W/m·K0.07 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,650 J/kg·K0.39 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

90°C194 °F
65°C149 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
5×10⁹ Ω·m1.97×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

4 kV/mm102 V/mil
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

11 MJ/kg4,729 BTU/lb
9 MJ/kg3,654 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.55 kg CO₂/kg
0.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
550 L/kg65.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

132 kN·m/kg
52 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17.1 MN·m/kg
23 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityOakSPF
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Oak vs SPF — frequently asked

Is Oak stronger than SPF?

Yes. Oak has a typical tensile strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for SPF — about 4.3 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Oak or SPF?

SPF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Oak is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Oak or SPF?

SPF. Its machinability rates excellent (95/100) against very good (70/100) for Oak.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Oak and SPF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.