FabDigitFabDigit

Birch vs Hard Maple

Natural Material · grade comparison

Birch and Hard Maple are both natural material grades. Birch is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) for Hard Maple, about 6% more. Birch is lighter (0.65 g/cm³ vs 0.7 g/cm³ for Hard Maple) and Birch is stiffer (13.9 GPa vs 12.6 GPa). On the shop floor, Birch sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Hard Maple (standard, $$).

BirchChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Birch vs Hard Maple: properties

BirchHard Maple

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

13.9 GPa2 Msi
12.6 GPa1.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

1 GPa0.15 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.43
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
108 MPa15.7 ksi

Compressive Strength

56 MPa8.1 ksi
54 MPa7.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

114 MPa16.5 ksi
109 MPa15.8 ksi

Shear Strength

13 MPa1.9 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.6 MPa·√m0.55 ksi·√in
0.5 MPa·√m0.46 ksi·√in

Same in both: Elongation at Break 1.5%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.65 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³
0.7 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Porosity

57%
53%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4 µm/m·K2.2 µin/in·°F
4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

2 kV/mm50.8 V/mil
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

11 MJ/kg4,729 BTU/lb
12 MJ/kg5,159 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.45 kg CO₂/kg
0.55 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Water 600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

177 kN·m/kg
154 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

21.4 MN·m/kg
18 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBirchHard Maple
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Birch vs Hard Maple — frequently asked

Is Birch stronger than Hard Maple?

Yes. Birch has a typical tensile strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) for Hard Maple — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, Birch or Hard Maple?

Birch is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Hard Maple is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Birch or Hard Maple?

Birch, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 75/100 against 70/100 for Hard Maple.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Birch and Hard Maple side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.