FabDigitFabDigit

Magnesium Alloy ZE41A vs ZM3

Magnesium Alloy · grade comparison

Magnesium Alloy ZE41A and ZM3 are both magnesium alloy grades. ZE41A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for ZM3, about 47% more; tensile strength follows at 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) vs 145 MPa (21 ksi). ZE41A is the more ductile: elongation 3.5% versus 3% for ZM3, and ZE41A is harder (62 HB vs 55 HB). ZM3 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 150°C continuous) and ZE41A conducts heat better (113 W/m·K vs 100 W/m·K). On the shop floor, ZM3 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ZE41A (high, $$$$).

ZE41AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ZM3Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

ZE41A vs ZM3: properties

ZE41AZM3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

16.5 GPa2.4 Msi
17 GPa2.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

3.5%
3%

Compressive Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

13 MPa·√m11.8 ksi·√in
12 MPa·√m10.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

62 HB
55 HB

Reduction in Area

—
3%

Hardness, Vickers

—
58 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 44 GPa6.4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 45 GPa6.5 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.35 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 70 MPa10.2 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.84 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.8 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

510°C950 °F
545°C1,013 °F

Liquidus Temperature

645°C1,193 °F
640°C1,184 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

113 W/m·K65.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

26.1 µm/m·K14.5 µin/in·°F
26.5 µm/m·K14.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

350 J/g150 BTU/lb
360 J/g155 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -70°C-94 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

26 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in
7×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.76 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -1.6 V · Corrosion Resistance 22 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

92 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 92 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 500% · Brazeability / Solderability 20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

340 MJ/kg146,174 BTU/lb
330 MJ/kg141,875 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

28 kg CO₂/kg
32 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

15%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Water 500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

111 kN·m/kg
81 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.9 MN·m/kg
24.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

223 kJ/m³
103 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

61.4 mm²/s
55.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

20
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every magnesium alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

701001502001.41.51.61.71.8Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleZE41AZM3

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityZE41AZM3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

ZE41A vs ZM3 — frequently asked

Is ZE41A stronger than ZM3?

Yes. ZE41A has a typical yield strength of 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for ZM3 — about 47% more. Tensile strength is 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) vs 145 MPa (21 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ZE41A or ZM3?

ZM3 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while ZE41A is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, ZE41A or ZM3?

ZE41A. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (65/100) for ZM3.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ZE41A and ZM3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.