FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy ERCu vs ERCuNi

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy ERCu and ERCuNi are both copper alloy grades. ERCuNi is the stronger of the two: yield strength 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for ERCu, about 175% more; tensile strength follows at 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 225 MPa (32.6 ksi). ERCuNi is harder — 90 HB against 55 HB for ERCu — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. ERCuNi is stiffer (152 GPa vs 115 GPa) and ERCuNi runs hotter in service (315°C vs 250°C continuous). On the shop floor, ERCu forms better (excellent vs very good).

ERCuNiChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

ERCu vs ERCuNi: properties

ERCuERCuNi

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
152 GPa22 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
57 GPa8.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
158 GPa22.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

225 MPa32.6 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

80 MPa11.6 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
32%

Reduction in Area

60%
45%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

70 J51.6 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
90 HB

Hardness, Vickers

58 HV
95 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
52 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,170°C2,138 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,080°C1,976 °F
1,240°C2,264 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

250 W/m·K144 BTU/hr·ft·°F
28 W/m·K16.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.7 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
315°C599 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-198°C-324 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

40 % IACS
4.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in
3.75×10⁻⁷ Ω·m14.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
74 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
28 / 100

Formability (cold)

92 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

92 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

78 / 100
72 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Weldability 78 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
6.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
45 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.9 MN·m/kg
17 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

28 kJ/m³
159 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

73 mm²/s
8.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

28
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleERCuERCuNi

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityERCuERCuNi
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

ERCu vs ERCuNi — frequently asked

Is ERCuNi stronger than ERCu?

Yes. ERCuNi has a typical yield strength of 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for ERCu — about 175% more. Tensile strength is 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 225 MPa (32.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ERCu or ERCuNi?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose ERCu over ERCuNi?

Pick ERCuNi when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ERCu and ERCuNi side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.