FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy CC490K vs ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy CC490K and ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2 are both copper alloy grades. ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 10% more; tensile strength follows at 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). In exchange, CC490K is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 13% for ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2, and ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2 is harder (75 HB vs 65 HB). ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2 is stiffer (95 GPa vs 90 GPa) and ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2 conducts electricity better (22 % IACS vs 15 % IACS). On the shop floor, ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CC490K (high, $$$$).

CC490KChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

CC490K vs ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2: properties

CC490KZCuZn38Mn2Pb2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
95 GPa13.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
13%

Reduction in Area

20%
12%

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
18 J13.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
35 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
80 HV

Compressive Strength

—
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
26 MPa·√m23.7 ksi·√in

Same in both: Shear Modulus 36 GPa5.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.5 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

900°C1,652 °F
880°C1,616 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
85 W/m·K49.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
22 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
7.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.07 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
57 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
70%

Weldability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
31 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.3 MN·m/kg
11.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

56 kJ/m³
64 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

23.8 mm²/s
26.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KZCuZn38Mn2Pb2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCC490KZCuZn38Mn2Pb2
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

CC490K vs ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2 — frequently asked

Is ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2 stronger than CC490K?

Yes. ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2 has a typical yield strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CC490K or ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2?

ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CC490K is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, CC490K or ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2?

ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2. Its weldability rates poor (30/100) against poor (25/100) for CC490K.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CC490K and ZCuZn38Mn2Pb2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.