FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy CC490K vs ZCuZn31Al2

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy CC490K and ZCuZn31Al2 are both copper alloy grades. ZCuZn31Al2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). In exchange, CC490K is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 16% for ZCuZn31Al2, and ZCuZn31Al2 is harder (30 HRB vs 25 HRB). ZCuZn31Al2 is stiffer (98 GPa vs 90 GPa) and ZCuZn31Al2 conducts heat better (100 W/m·K vs 78 W/m·K). On the shop floor, CC490K machines more easily (very good vs fair) and ZCuZn31Al2 welds better (fair vs poor).

CC490KChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

ZCuZn31Al2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

CC490K vs ZCuZn31Al2: properties

CC490KZCuZn31Al2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
98 GPa14.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
38 GPa5.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
16%

Reduction in Area

20%
18%

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
18 J13.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
30 HRB

Compressive Strength

—
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Hardness, Brinell 65 HB · Hardness, Vickers 68 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.5 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

900°C1,652 °F
880°C1,616 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
905°C1,661 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
20 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
22 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
7.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.07 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
40%

Weldability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
38 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.3 MN·m/kg
11.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

56 kJ/m³
80 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

23.8 mm²/s
31 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KZCuZn31Al2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCC490KZCuZn31Al2
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

CC490K vs ZCuZn31Al2 — frequently asked

Is ZCuZn31Al2 stronger than CC490K?

Yes. ZCuZn31Al2 has a typical yield strength of 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CC490K or ZCuZn31Al2?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CC490K or ZCuZn31Al2?

CC490K. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against fair (50/100) for ZCuZn31Al2; for welding the order is ZCuZn31Al2 first (fair, 40/100) then CC490K (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CC490K and ZCuZn31Al2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.