FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy CC490K vs HBsC3

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy CC490K and HBsC3 are both copper alloy grades. HBsC3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 3.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). In exchange, CC490K is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 18% for HBsC3, and HBsC3 is harder (180 HB vs 65 HB). HBsC3 is lighter (7.8 g/cm³ vs 8.7 g/cm³ for CC490K) and HBsC3 is stiffer (103 GPa vs 90 GPa). On the shop floor, CC490K machines more easily (very good vs fair).

CC490KChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

HBsC3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

CC490K vs HBsC3: properties

CC490KHBsC3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
108 GPa15.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
18%

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
86 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
190 HV

Compressive Strength

—
700 MPa102 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Reduction in Area 20%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

900°C1,652 °F
890°C1,634 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
925°C1,697 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.29 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
30%

Weldability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
85 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.3 MN·m/kg
13.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

56 kJ/m³
497 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

23.8 mm²/s
12.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KHBsC3

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCC490KHBsC3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

CC490K vs HBsC3 — frequently asked

Is HBsC3 stronger than CC490K?

Yes. HBsC3 has a typical yield strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 3.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CC490K or HBsC3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CC490K or HBsC3?

CC490K. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against fair (35/100) for HBsC3; for welding the order is HBsC3 first (poor, 30/100) then CC490K (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CC490K and HBsC3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.