FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy CC490K vs CC767S

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy CC490K and CC767S are both copper alloy grades. CC767S is the stronger of the two: yield strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 50% more; tensile strength follows at 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). CC767S is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 20% for CC490K, and CC767S is harder (80 HB vs 65 HB). CC767S is lighter (8.3 g/cm³ vs 8.7 g/cm³ for CC490K) and CC767S is stiffer (100 GPa vs 90 GPa). On the shop floor, CC490K machines more easily (very good vs fair) and CC767S welds better (fair vs poor).

CC490KChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

CC767SChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CC490K vs CC767S: properties

CC490KCC767S

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
38 GPa5.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
32%

Reduction in Area

20%
30%

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
32 J23.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
40 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
85 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

900°C1,652 °F
880°C1,616 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
105 W/m·K60.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
20 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
8.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.39 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
130%

Weldability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Castability 85 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
47 MJ/kg20,206 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.1 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.3 MN·m/kg
12 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

56 kJ/m³
113 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

23.8 mm²/s
33.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KCC767S

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCC490KCC767S
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

CC490K vs CC767S — frequently asked

Is CC767S stronger than CC490K?

Yes. CC767S has a typical yield strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 50% more. Tensile strength is 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CC490K or CC767S?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CC490K or CC767S?

CC490K. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against fair (45/100) for CC767S; for welding the order is CC767S first (fair, 40/100) then CC490K (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CC490K and CC767S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.